Sunday 4 July 2021

Annex E - Information Sent to Members of Pembrokeshire County Council's Planning Committee for the Meeting on 20 April 2021.

Annex E 

Planning Reasons

for

Refusing

Planning Application 20/0732/PA


A special note: The highlighted text refers to the relevant planning documents, the aspects of which are being discussed in each paragraph. Some abbreviations are....

PPW - Planning Policy Wales - click here to download this document.
LDP - Local Development Plan - click here to access the web pages relating to the LDP, and here for the descriptive document.
SP - Strategic Policy
GN - General Policy


Reasons

 

1)            The scheme proposed would have negative environmental and social impact on those living in and around the site. Given the magnitude and impact of what is proposed, there are only vague expressions of the likelihood of it providing economic benefit to the local community. The scheme is not of strategic national importance otherwise it would be determined at government level. (PPW 11 Ch 2 People and Places: Achieving Well-being Through Placemaking; PPW 11 Section 6, 6.7.12)

 

2)            The scheme is inappropriate and damaging for a site within a Conservation Area, set within a Landscape of Outstanding Historical Interest. (Pembroke Dock Conservation Area Appraisal, LDP SP 4, Plan Strategy 5.21 p.53; LDP GN 38 p.127-129; PPW 11 Ch 2 People and Places: Achieving Well-being Through Placemaking; PPW 11, Section 6)

 

3)            The area is identified in the LDP as having been allocated as an employment zone. Transformative development does NOT have to be such that it destroys the historical assets within its boundaries. Any transformation that takes place should build upon the assets already existing, particularly in a place that has such significance for cultural history of Pembroke Dock. This scheme is destructive of the cultural and amenity value of the site. (LDP GN 35, esp. 6.148, p125, PPW 11 Ch 2 People and Places: Achieving Well-being Through Placemaking)

 

4)            Alternative sites for the scheme are available within the haven, but these have not been explored adequately by the applicant. The applicant’s trust port status places an obligation on them to build upon the assets that give the community of Pembroke Dock a sense of culture, place and well-being. In return they have been given extraordinary powers which they are now using to prize a project into their own property, for which it is ill suited for a range of reasons. (PPW 11 Ch 2 People and Places: Achieving Well-being Through Placemaking; PPW 11, Section 6 throughout)

 

5)            The scheme would detract from the clear potential that the site has to act as a catalyst in boosting the visitor economy of Pembroke Dock. The site has obvious and great potential to help make Pembroke Dock into destination that visitors would return to. (LDP SP5 Plan Strategy 5.26 – 5.28, pp. 53-54; LDP GN 16, p.98; LDP GN 38 p.127-129; PPW 11 Ch 2 People and Places: Achieving Well-being Through Placemaking; PPW 11, Section 6 throughout)

 

6)            The scheme would, due to its scale and location, have a negative effect on the prospect of developing high-quality visitor accommodation within Pembroke Dock. The ability to cater for tourists and tourism is an identified leading characteristic of the Pembrokeshire economy. (LDP SP 1, p.48; LDP SP 5 Sec 5.26-5.28; LDP SP 16, p. 73, LDP GN 1, pp. 75-78; LDP GN 2, pp. 79-80; GN 3, 6.22 p. 82-83; PPW 11 Section 5.5, esp. 5.5.2, 5.5.4; PPW 11, Section 6 throughout)

 

7)            Apart from the destruction of a unique signature collection of listed monuments that are a statement of the origins of Pembroke Dock, the proposed fabrication sheds and swathes of concrete inflict severe damage on the settings of other listed buildings and scheduled monuments within the dockyard and wider conservation area. Notably the buildings whose context and setting will be drastically altered for the worse are:

i)             Paterchurch (Listed Grade I and Scheduled Monument).

ii)            SW Dockyard Tower (Listed Grade II* and Scheduled Monument).

iii)           Bomb Stores at West End of Fort Road (Scheduled Monument).

iv)           Defensible Barracks (Listed Grade II* and Scheduled Monument).

v)            The former Commodore Hotel (Listed Grade II*).

vi)           The former Oakum Store (Listed Grade II).

vii)          The Foremens’ Office (Listed Grade II).

viii)         A series of listed buildings that with The Commodore comprise the Terrace and Gateways etc. (Listed Grade II*)

ix)           A series of listed Offices, Stores and Houses (Grade II)

 

See: https://cadw.gov.wales/advice-support/cof-cymru/search-cadw-records for further examples. (LDP GN 38 p.127-129)

 

9)            The destruction of so many other buildings within the dockyard, that incorporate much skill, worked materials and effort is a waste of natural resources. Many of these buildings could be put to good use in a scenario that is very different and more sustainable than that proposed. (LDP GN 38 p.127-129)

 

10)          The applicant is intending to use its extraordinary, but now inappropriate powers, to summarily evict a number of freeholders and tenants to allow the proposed scheme to take place. In many cases this means that the businesses displaced will find it extremely difficult to find alternative accommodation. This will undoubtedly affect their well-being and future economic resilience. (PPW 11, 3.57 Compulsory Purchase is inappropriate as other sites exists)

 

11)          The amenity of residents and properties within close proximity to the site will be severely diminished leading to loss of personal well-being and those characteristics of one’s home or workspace that make for a pleasant life. (PPW 11 Ch 2 People and Places: Achieving Well-being Through Placemaking)

 

12)          The location of some fabrication sheds and concrete work areas will allow unavoidable construction and maintenance noise to impinge on the well-being of patients, staff and visitors at the neighbouring South Pembrokeshire Hospital. (PPW 11, 3.19 – 3.24, pp. 29-30; PPW 11 Section 6, 6.7.12, 6.7.22 - 23)

 

13)          The design of the proposed buildings is unsustainable. (PPW 11, throughout, but para. 2.6 and 2.7 is a good summary)

 

14)          The design of the buildings pays but an imagined regard to local distinctiveness. (LDP GN 38 p.127-129; PPW 11, Section 6 throughout)

 

15)          The scheme, of uncertain nature and future, will critically diminish any future opportunities that Pembroke Dock will be able draw upon to use its rich history for its own economic benefit. The community needs to establish a long term, viable economy that is independent of external windfall funding and influence. (LDP GN 38 p.127-129. PPW 11, Page 7 summary header. i.e

What is Sustainable Development?

“Sustainable Development” means the process of improving the economic, social, environmental and cultural well-being of Wales by taking action, in accordance with the sustainable development principle, aimed at achieving the well-being goals.

Acting in accordance with the sustainable development principle means that a body must act in a manner which seeks to ensure that the needs of the present are met without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.)

 

16) The Development could be sited elsewhere in Pembrokeshire. Other possible locations are:

·         Blackbridge, S/EMP/086/LDP/01, area 33.45 ha, Use Class B1, B2, B8.

·         Pembroke Science and Technology Park, Pembroke Dock, S/EMP/096/00001, area 22.38 ha, Use Class B1.

·         Waterloo Industrial Estate, Pembroke Dock.

·         A co-operative venture with one of the fossil fuel focused businesses that occupy land on either side of the Milford Haven Waterway.

 

(LDP SP 3, p. 51 for the first two locations above; LDP GN 39, p.129-130; PPW 11, Section 6 throughout, 6.4.14, 6.7.12)

 

17) The site in the western dockyard would involve the movement of large, heavily laden vehicles through the Pembroke Dock Conservation Area. A site to the east of the town, at Waterloo and Warrior Way would give easier access from the A477. This location is also more convenient for the siting of a railhead on the empty plot adjacent to the railway track into Pembroke Dock. This land is owned by the applicant and such a move would at least reduce the number of heavy lorry trips required to be made along the A477. (LDP SP 10, p.61; LDP GN 39, p.129-130, PPW 11, Section 4.1, esp.4.1.4 and 4.1.5. Also Section 5.3, esp. 5.3.19)

 

18) Pembroke Dock is identified as a hub town in the LDP. This scheme undermines the admirable ambitions stated in the LDP. (LDP SP 14, p. 68)

 

AJ. 5/4/2021

No comments:

Post a Comment

If you can add to the information in any of my blog postings, or have a question, please write a comment, or use the contact form I will endeavour to respond as soon as I can.