Thursday 21 January 2021

Royal Dockyard Pembroke - The Reason that Pembroke Dock Exists - 4

 Heritage Under Threat - 4 (A Blighted View)


This post is very straight forward. Below are a series of views generated using SketchUp 3D modelling software and Google Earth for PC. Both pieces of software are free to use. I have also used a website called Hey! What's That! that allows you to produce viewsheds of particular locations and heights.

A viewshed is the area visible form a particular location. This area also shows the points from which the centre of origin of the viewshed is visible. More information here.

The viewsheds shown are theoretical and do not allow for buildings and trees. I feel sure that you will get my drift!

These diagrams are intended to show the visual effect of  the proposals that Milford Haven Port Authority have to infill and bury  the Timber Pond (listed Grade 2) and the Graving Dock (Listed Grade 2*) at Pembroke Dockyard to enable the speculative construction of massive, 40 metre high fabrication sheds. These will dominate the views around the dockyard, the town of Pembroke Dock and, as these pictures show, a much wider area. The proposal is within  the Pembroke Dock Conservation Area and within the Milford Haven Landscape of Outstanding Historical Interest.

The following images show the visibility of either the 40 metre shed to be built over the Graving Dock or the 40 metre shed built over the Timber Pond (or both). I have selected a height at just under 40 metres above ground level at the centre of each proposed building.

The first diagram is a key to the dockyard buildings as shown on each the following pictures.

Key





Figure 1


Figure 2


Figure 3


Figure 4


Figure 5


My next post will show other images from closer quarters that will demonstrate the inappropriate nature of this proposal.

See also:






The usual plea to finish off....

Please do get involved and contact Pembrokeshire County Council with your views. Comments about the planning application can be made by following the instructions at the link below:

https://www.pembrokeshire.gov.uk/planning-applications/commenting-on-applications

The planning application has the reference: 20/0732/PA

The official deadline for comments is: 22 January 2021  29 January 2021

However, there is a very strong case for extending this, as despite Milford Haven Port Authority's efforts to subvert the planning process by submitting the application at the start of the Christmas break, when everyone else has other things on their mind, there are several extenuating circumstances that should be taken into account.

  • The application is for an outline consent, but contains so much detail that there is very little left for future consideration should the application be passed;
  • There are over 120 documents submitted as part of the application. These could possibly be read on the PCC planning website, but are so mixed up, inappropriately labelled when downloaded that they make for very difficult and disjointed reading;
  • Important information is missing from the application that would describe the overall impact of the scheme in a transparent way - for example the set of montage views from various viewpoints that show waht the sheds would look like when built - the view from Llanreath would be an interesting one!;
  • The scheme is VERY speculative and there is little eidence of actual need for what is proposed;
  • There are alternative sites that MHPA part own, some of which would directly support and utilise  local employers, that have not been given adequate consideration;
  • If  alternative sites are used then this would open up the western dockyard as a wonderful tourism, heritage, boating and watersports venue - a truly all year stopover attraction on the way to Ireland;
  • Working in partnership with another organisation (apart from PCC who are strategic partners , I believe) has not, as far as I am aware, been explored in any great depth. Remember, PCC is the planning authority who will decide on the outcome of this scheme;

More to follow.....within hours

Thanks - Keep safe and keep well!



Monday 18 January 2021

Royal Dockyard Pembroke - The Reason that Pembroke Dock Exists - 3

  Heritage Under Threat - 3


Figure 1


The rather tatty photograph at Figure 1, taken in c.1900  from Lanion to the north-east of Pembroke Dockyard , shows the building slips in The Yard that still had sheds covering them.

Slips 1 and 2, the most westerly, have different roof lines to the other sheds. These two slips, although long denuded of their coverings, are due to be altered in a major way as part of Milford Haven Port Authority's plans, known as the Pembroke Dock Infrastructure. The listed monuments due to be majorly affected by this project are:

  • The Timber Pond (Listed Grade II)
  • The Graving Dock (Listed Grade II*)
  • Slip 1 (Listed Grade II)
  • Slip 2 (Listed Grade II)
  • Foreman’s Office or former guard house (Listed Grade II)
This post is mainly about Slips 1 and 2.

Slips 1 and 2 (Listed Grade II)

These two slips are survivors of the 13 building slips that Pembroke Dockyard had at its disposal over the course of its naval working life. Two other slips remain in some degree - slips 3 and 4. Both are now used by Mainstay Marine Solutions in their marine fabrication work. I am told, but cannot confirm this, that Slip 4 is the least altered.

The other slips were adapted by the RAF when Pembroke Dock became a flying boat base in the 1930s, until they were finally buried or destroyed to build the infrequently used Quay 1 in the eastern part of the dockyard.
Figure 2



Figure2  shows the interior of either slip 1 or 2 with a warship in the early stages of construction. The date is c1902.

Figure 3 shows HMS Defence entering the water from Slip 1 in 1907.
Figure 3




Figure 4 shows another slip in the dockyard, now buried under the deep water berth or the ferry terminal. It looks rather neglected, but the facility that such a structure offers to the small boat owner is obvious. At the same time it preserves the monument in a recognisable state....or this one DID.

It is worth noting that the public hard on Front Street, just outside the eastern wall of the dockyard was badly damaged when the deep water berth was dredged and as far as I am aware it has never been returned to it former condition.

Figure 4 (Copyright Unknown)


Milford Haven Port Authority proposes to combine both Slips 1 and 2 (Listed Grade II) into a "Super Slip". This will be achieved by removing the bar of land between the two slips whilst retaining the eastern wall of Slip 2 and the western wall of Slip 1. The stone and soil from the removed piece of land will be used as fill for the Timber Pond (Listed Grade II) and The Graving Dock (Listed Grade II*), both of which will be capped with concrete.

Further more, the construction of the slip, which will involve digging up to four metres into bed rock, could potentially cause problems for the foundations of the wonderful Carr Jetty (Listed Grade II), which is sited immediately to the west of Slips 1 and 2.

The Super Slip is supposedly required for the launching of large marine energy devices that might be built within the fabrication sheds. Have a look on Youtube. One you might start with is:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWNGhWyLqIw

Remember, this project is a speculative venture and I will comment about this (perhaps) in future posts. Listed heritage structures may be destroyed for a project that may never find a use that will justify the cost and loss.

Figure 5
Figure 5 is a LIDAR scan of the dockyard area.

  • Red denotes buildings that existed in c1860 that still stand;
  • Pale blue indicates the approximate footprint of the proposed two huge  sheds;
  • Pink denotes the extent of the proposed super slip;
  • Blue stars indicate the location of listed buildings and structures;

Figure 6 is a view of the foreshore in front of the two slips

Figure 6

Figures 7 and 8 show the Carr Jetty (Listed Grade II), which lies a few metres west of the proposed super slip and could be damaged by works. The Carr Jetty was built c1899 to enable ships launched at Pembroke Dockyard to be fitted out. Previously this was done at Hobbs Point. It is named after the Carr Rocks, which it partially sits on/

Figure 7

Figure 8

Please also see:










The usual plea to finish off....

Please do get involved and contact Pembrokeshire County Council with your views. Comments about the planning application can be made by following the instructions at the link below:

https://www.pembrokeshire.gov.uk/planning-applications/commenting-on-applications

The planning application has the reference: 20/0732/PA

The official deadline for comments is: 29 January 2021

However, there is a very strong case for extending this, as despite Milford Haven Port Authority's efforts to subvert the planning process by submitting the application at the start of the Christmas break, when everyone else has other things on their mind, there are several extenuating circumstances that should be taken into account.

  • The application is for an outline consent, but contains so much detail that there is very little left for future consideration should the application be passed;
  • There are over 120 documents submitted as part of the application. These could possibly be read on the PCC planning website, but are so mixed up, inappropriately labelled when downloaded that they make for very difficult and disjointed reading;
  • Important information is missing from the application that would describe the overall impact of the scheme in a transparent way - for example the set of montage views from various viewpoints that show waht the sheds would look like when built - the view from Llanreath would be an interesting one!;
  • The scheme is VERY speculative and there is little eidence of actual need for what is proposed;
  • There are alternative sites that MHPA part own, some of which would directly support and utilise  local employers, that have not been given adequate consideration;
  • If  alternative sites are used then this would open up the western dockyard as a wonderful tourism, heritage, boating and watersports venue - a truly all year stopover attraction on the way to Ireland;
  • Working in partnership with another organisation (apart from PCC who are strategic partners , I believe) has not, as far as I am aware, been explored in any great depth. Remember, PCC is the planning authority who will decide on the outcome of this scheme;

More to follow.....so until next time......

Thanks - Keep safe and keep well!


























Saturday 16 January 2021

Royal Dockyard Pembroke - The Reason that Pembroke Dock Exists - 2

 Heritage Under Threat - 2

Figure 1

This post continues the discussion about Milford Haven Port Authority's planning application to destroy the unique assemblage of naval construction heritage monuments at Pembroke Dockyard, Pembrokeshire in Wales. Part 1 of this series of blog posts can be found here.

The listed heritage monuments under threat include:

  • The Timber Pond (Listed Grade II)
  • The Graving Dock (Listed Grade II*)
  • Slip 1 (Listed Grade II)
  • Slip 2 (Listed Grade II)
  • Foreman’s Office or former guard house (Listed Grade II)
This post is  about the Graving Dock.

The Graving Dock (Listed Grade II*)

The advertisement in Figure 1 is from a guide to Pembroke from the 1960s. It shows what is known as the Graving Dock (Listed Grade II*), which was operated at this time by R. S. Hayes as a ship repair and refitting facility. The illustration is pretty accurate and I remember the dark crane being a feature of the skyline of Pembroke Dockyard when I was a child

Why is it called a Graving Dock?  Titanic Belfast provides a very clear explanation:

The word 'graving' is an obsolete nautical term for the scraping, cleaning, painting, or tarring of an underwater body. Combined with the word 'dock' a graving dock refers to an enclosed basin into which a ship is taken for underwater cleaning or repair.

For some more information and pictures of the Graving Dock in Pembroke Dockyard you can also look here.

Originally the dock was much smaller, but it was extended later in the nineteenth century as the size of warships increased.  Figure 2 shows the graving dock as it is today. It is silted and has had some soil pushed into it to form a ramp for vehicles to gain access to the bottom of the dock.

The rusting object immediately in front of the camera is the old floating gate or caisson for the dock.

Figure 2

The next picture, Figure 3 is a much older photograph taken from the floor of the dock, but it gives a better view of the end of the caisson. You will notice a timber strip than runs down the side of the caisson. Both ends of the caisson have the same strip of timber and when in use it was capable of floating in the dock, just like a small ship.

Figure 3

Figure 4 shows the other end of the graving dock that is now open to the sea. In the wall you will notice a slot that runs from the top of the dock wall to the base. This is the slot for the timber strip on the end of the caisson.

Figure 4


When it was required to allow a ship into the dock, the caisson had air pumped out of its ballast tanks and, at high tide, was towed to one side of the entrance to the dock (outside the dock). The ship would be floated into the dock and once suitably positioned, the caisson would be maneuvred back to the entrance and its ballast tanks would be slowly flooded, allowing the caisson to sink, whilst engaging the wooden strips at each end  within the slots on either side of the entrance.

When the caisson had sunk to the bottom of the dock (which was of hard masonary) a steam pump would begin to pump the water out of the dry dock. The ship would slowly sink and the keel carefully positioned onto blocks at the botton of the dock. As the water was pumped out and the ship settled, it would need to be stabilised by wooden posts which were wedged against the stepped side of the dock. These would hold the ship upright. The caisson would be pretty water tight and any leaks could be stopped up with caulking.

The reason why a caisson was used instead of conventional hinged gates was that the hinges and dock gates, by their nature, narrowed the entrance to the graving dock. The caisson, on the other hand could be floated to one side, out of the way.

To refloat a ship (or ships) in the dock, the procedure was reversed. Water was pumped back into the dock as the tide was rising. It is believed that the Timber Pond served as a supply of water for the pumps, as the two structures are connected by pipes and conduits. When the dock had enough water in it to float the ship, but the level being lower than the sea level outside, the caisson would have air pumped into the ballast tanks and would slowly lift off the bottom of the dock, thus allowing the water levels inside and outside the dock to equalise. The caisson was then moved to one side and the ship floated out into open water.

[Edit: I have finally found the plan below after days of hunting. The plan will give you a better idea of the form of the Graving Dock at Pembroke Dock Yard. See Figure 4a.]

Figure 4a





A Possible Alternative Use for the Graving Dock?

Instead of burying the dock, covering it in concrete and placing a 40 metre high shed  on top of this base - some alternatives:

  • Reinstate the Graving Dock and use it to hoste Tall Ships for refit, cleaning and maintenance in the "off-season";
  •  Permanently dock an historic vessel and have the ship open for visitors. The site, in concert with the other monuments being discussed, could be coordinated and run by the the West Wales Maritime Trust or a specifically constituted not-for profit organisation;
  • Seal the dock and convert it into a theatre or other open air performance space, adapting the structure but retaining its original form;

As with the Timber Pond (Listed Grade II), the Graving Dock (Listed Grade II*) is part of a unique range of monuments that lay testament to the reason why Pembroke Dock came into existence. With much of the industrial dockyard water frontages having been destroyed on the eastern side of the yard, it is vitally important that this part of the dockyard is preserved so that future generations can have at least some small appreciation of what the place meant in its hey-day.

Leaving these monuments to just sit there and deteriorate is not a long term solution, but it is certainly better than burying them and losing the value of what they mean to the town. Restricted access to the area, hidden behind tall walls, has not allowed the residents of Pembroke Dock and much further afield to appreciate what was once here and to understand why Pembroke Dock, in the nineteenth and first part of the twentieth century was a town with a huge reserve of skilled and hard working men and women. They literally built up a thriving community in a far flung corner of Wales, applying their dockyard skills to their homes, gardens and community buildings.

This is why there must be a change of direction and commitment from those who would use the town to suit their own needs at the expense of others. Revive these derelict places and make a good living from them. The town does not need to be robbed of its unique heritage by others who should know better.

Moving on.....

The shed that it is intended to place on top of the Graving Dock, is not as long as the one to be built over the Timber Pond, (see my previous post), but at a height of 40 metres, it is still very massive. I showed some images  produced for Milford Haven Port Authority by by their contractor RPS in my previous post. These give some impression of the effect that such buildings will have on the dockyard, town and its surroundings. I will show a small part of one photograph to illustrate the point further, but first let me set the scene.

The photograph below, Figure 5, shows the Oakum Store. This was an important building in the Ministry of Defence part of the dockyard, before the MOD relinquished it. It is a beautiful, well built late Georgian  building that is now the offices of Mainstay Marine Solutions (more about this company in a future post).

Figure 5

Figure 6

The Oakum Store was used to store oakum! The oakum was used to seal gaps in the wooden planking of ships - a practice known as caulking.

The Graving Dock is located behind (to the north-west) of the Oakum Store. Immediately to the north of this grey limestone building, across the road, is one of the covered slips or fabrication areas that are used by Mainstay Marine Solutions in their work. It appears as the white building in Figure 5.

The Oakum Store has always been one of the landmark buildings that was visible from the Barrack Hill, the high ground to the south of the dockyard. The next photograph shows the Oakum Store with the new shed over the buried Graving Dock as proposed. It gives scale to the real size of the proposed shed that will cover the buried Graving Dock. See Figure 7.

Figure 7

This project is both destructive and oppressive and I do not believe that it should be allowed. You should decide for yourself.


Please do get involved and contact Pembrokeshire County Council with your views. Comments about the planning application can be made by following the instructions at the link below:

https://www.pembrokeshire.gov.uk/planning-applications/commenting-on-applications

The planning application has the reference: 20/0732/PA

The official deadline for comments is: 29 January 2021

However, there is a very strong case for extending this, as despite Milford Haven Port Authority's efforts to subvert the planning process by submitting the application at the start of the Christmas break, when everyone else has other things on their mind, there are several extenuating circumstances that should be taken into account.

  • The application is for an outline consent, but contains so much detail that there is very little left for future consideration should the application be passed;
  • There are over 120 documents submitted as part of the application. These could possibly be read on the PCC planning website, but are so mixed up, inappropriately labelled when downloaded that they make for very difficult and disjointed reading;
  • Important information is missing from the application that would describe the overall impact of the scheme in a transparent way - for example the set of montage views from various viewpoints that show waht the sheds would look like when built - the view from Llanreath would be an interesting one!;
  • The scheme is VERY speculative and there is little eidence of actual need for what is proposed;
  • There are alternative sites that MHPA part own, some of which would directly support and utilise  local employers, that have not been given adequate consideration;
  • If  alternative sites are used then this would open up the western dockyard as a wonderful tourism, heritage, boating and watersports venue - a truly all year stopover attraction on the way to Ireland;
  • Working in partnership with another organisation (apart from PCC who are strategic partners , I believe) has not, as far as I am aware, been explored in any great depth. Remember, PCC is the planning authority who will decide on the outcome of this scheme;

I will write more about the other monuments in this scheme in future posts. 


As always, Thanks - Keep safe and keep well!

Thursday 14 January 2021

Royal Dockyard Pembroke - The Reason that Pembroke Dock Exists - 1

Heritage Under Threat - 1


Pembroke Dock or Pater - (pronounced "Patter") was a place of rural idyll in the first decade of the nineteenth century. This changed when Pater Yard was established by the Navy Board to meet the demand for warships to defend the burgeoning empire from the threat of Napolean.  In about 1814 the area was transformed from relative tranquility into a small town of urban industrial bustle. The story of the beginnings of Pembroke Dock can be read in "Pembroke Dockyard and the Old Navy" by Lt. Commander Lawrie Phillips. Indeed, the whole story of the place can be read, from the beginning until when the Admiralty left.

The dockyard has often been, since the Admiralty left, a place of mystery. Hidden behind huge limestone walls of wonderful craftsmanship it has often seemed off limits to any, and all, visitors. However, in later years the advent of the Irish Ferry Terminal and the ill thought out  "Route 9" into the yard, breaching the tall wall, has allowed things to become more visible. It has allowed places to be explored once again.

Sadly, much of what has still to be discovered by many of the people of Pembrokeshire and beyond is under the threat of obliteration - or worse.

The remaining threatened group of historical and unique industrial monuments are in the western Dockyard, and include:

  • The Timber Pond (Listed Grade II)
  • The Graving Dock (Listed Grade II*)
  • Slip 1 (Listed Grade II)
  • Slip 2 (Listed Grade II)
  • Foreman’s Office or former guard house (Listed Grade II)
This blog post is about the proposed fate of the probably UNIQUE Timber Pond. (Grade II).

The Timber Pond (Listed Grade 2) see More information.

If you work for Svitzer (a towage and salvage company) you will have the privelege of  passing through a gate in the dockyard wall and seeing this unique feature - a survival from the early days of the dockyard. I cannot find another in the UK. It is finely built and despite the neglect it has endured, it is largely sound. What a fantastic piece of calm sea water in which youngsters and adults could train in sea borne skills - canoes, kayaks, dinghies - behind the shelter of the grey limestone wall, shielding the novices from the westerly wind. Indeed this is what the place was used for in the past by the sea cadets. Now - nothing. Its fate? To be buried and covered in concrete with a 40 metre (appx 140 ft) high shed built on top.

This, the only remaining historical feature of this type in the entire UK, willbe buried.

What would this look like? Milford Haven Port Authority have commissioned some illustrations that can be obtained from Pembrokeshire County Council's planning website (Application 20/0732/PA). Use this link and scroll to the end of the document (97 pages!). (I have used very small amounts of some documents under the terms of "fair use".)

The huge shed that will be built over the site of the Timber Pond will have a dramatic impact on both the views of Pembroke Dock and the views from Pembroke Dock. The illustrations in the document above are limited to views that are, due to the perspective and viewing positions and angles chosen, less disturbing than they actually are.

This example, is a portion of the view of the proposed shed over the timber pond, as seen from Neyland. The full image can be seen at the end of this link. (Page 88)

This view, taken from Hazelbeach, is from Page 87 of the above document. It gives a far better impression of the size of the shed over the Timber Pond.



Another problem with the shed over the Timber Pond, apart from the burial of a very rare, if not unique, example of a masonary Timber Pond in the UK, is the way in which the historical view from the oldest building in Pembroke Dock is dramatically compromised.

This building is Paterchurch, now in private hands and sometimes open for public access. You can follow the link below for more information about Paterchurch. 

Link: https://pdboyinsuffolk.blogspot.com/2014/03/paterchurch-tower-pembroke-docks-last.html

The fourth post in the series of articles that you can access via the above link, describes the views that were, and indeed still are, available from the top of Paterchurch. 

The tower was probably part of a medieval fortified house. Its position allowed it to have a clear view of the whole length of the haven, so vessels entering between St. Annes's Head and Angle could, in clear weather, be spotted as soon as they rounded Thorne Island at the entrance to the harbour.

The map below (Figure 3) shows the extent of the field of observation from the top of the tower at Paterchurch. The red area shows the region of visibility from the top of Paterchurch tower. This area is known as the viewshed of the tower. The narrow slot of apparently no view in the middle of the haven is due to the modern mapping used to calculate the view shed. The view nowadays is obstructed by the jetties, but in medieval times the view would not be blocked by such obstacles...they did not exist!

Figure 3

Paterchurch in medival times probably had a role as a watch tower for Pembroke Castle, just 3 kilometres to the south-east. Movement by sea was far slower at the time and there would have been ample time to send warning to the Castle if an invasion fleet should appear below St. Anne's Head.


Figure 4 - The view west from Paterchurch tower in 2014

The shed built over the buried Timber Pond, at a height of 40 metres, would effectively obliterate this historical view that probable gave an important purpose to Paterchurch.

Equally, if we analyse the viewshed of this shed, by calculating where the shed would be visible from in the surrounding countryside, we become aware of the impact this building would have on the visual amenity of the surrounding countryside. Much of this countryside is part of the Pembroke Dock Conservation Area. It is also within a Landscape of Outstanding Historic Interest and it is very visible from parts of the Pembrokeshire Coast National Park.

The results of this viewshed analysis are shown below. The height of the shed is taken to be just under 40 metres above ground level. This height is taken to be at a point directly above the centre of the Timber Pond. A point on any extreme spot of the building's apex would give different results. The results shown can be considered indicative of the likely visual impact of this huge building.

Viewshed of the Building over the Timber Pond - Shows full area of visibility

Viewshed of Building over Timber Pond - Closer View

Viewshed of Building over Timber Pond - East of Pembroke Dock

Viewshed of Building over Timber Pond - West of Pembroke Dock

The destruction of a unique assemblage of historical shipbuilding monuments is but the thin end of a very thick wedge that would have a massive visual impact on both the town of Pembroke Dock and the wider area.

Milford Haven Port Authority claim that the Timber Pond will be buried in such a way that it could be "unburied and restored" at a later date. This is a ridiculous notion as the cost of recovering this rare monument could be easily be up to 25 times or more than the cost of burying it. The idea is a deliberate attempt to mask the destruction of a structure that is part of the story and industry that gave birth to, and named, Pembroke Dock. 

Some will say that the scheme will create much needed jobs. It might, but evidence of this is very thin on the ground. Any future boost to the local economy, that might come about through promoting and exploiting Pembroke Dock's heritage, will be dealt a savage blow. This would sacrifice any possible long-term, sustainable economic benefit to one of the - and don't be shocked - most individual and graceful towns in Wales.

Please also see:







Please do get involved and contact Pembrokeshire County Council with your views. Comments about the planning application can be made by following the instructions at the link below:

https://www.pembrokeshire.gov.uk/planning-applications/commenting-on-applications

The planning application has the reference: 20/0732/PA

The official deadline for comments is: 22 January 2021 29 January 2021

However, there is a very strong case for extending this, as despite Milford Haven Port Authority's efforts to subvert the planning process by submitting the application at the start of the Christmas break, when everyone else has other things on their mind, there are several extenuating circumstances that should be taken into account.

  • The application is for an outline consent, but contains so much detail that there is very little left for future consideration should the application be passed;
  • There are over 120 documents submitted as part of the application. These could possibly be read on the PCC planning website, but are so mixed up, inappropriately labelled when downloaded that they make for very difficult and disjointed reading;
  • Important information is missing from the application that would describe the overall impact of the scheme in a transparent way - for example the set of montage views from various viewpoints that show waht the sheds would look like when built - the view from Llanreath would be an interesting one!;
  • The scheme is VERY speculative and there is little eidence of actual need for what is proposed;
  • There are alternative sites that MHPA part own, some of which would directly support and utilise  local employers, that have not been given adequate consideration;
  • If  alternative sites are used then this would open up the western dockyard as a wonderful tourism, heritage, boating and watersports venue - a truly all year stopover attraction on the way to Ireland;
  • Working in partnership with another organisation (apart from PCC who are strategic partners , I believe) has not, as far as I am aware, been explored in any great depth. Remember, PCC is the planning authority who will decide on the outcome of this scheme;

I will write more about the other monuments in this scheme in future posts. 


Thanks - Keep safe and keep well!