Saturday 27 February 2021

Pembroke Dock Infrastructure - Milford Haven Port Authority Answers some Questions Question 2.

Milford Haven Port Authority’s Responses to Questions Posed at the Recent Advisory Committee Meeting – Question 2

 

Billy Gannon, The Pembroke Dock Community Representative on Milford Haven Port Authority’s (MHPA) Advisory Committee, has received the following response to one of the questions put to the MHPA at their last advisory meeting.

Question 2 was:

2. Have MHPA explored the possibility of siting the Pembroke Dock Marine project on any other part of the Haven?

 

Reply from MHPA: Yes.  An Options Appraisal, including alternative sites, did form part of the appraisal process and this was included in the environmental impact assessment. The three unique attributes of this site are that (i) it has a substantial area of flat land adjacent to (ii) sufficiently deep water (iii) outside the boundary of the Special Area of Conservation. No other part of the Haven (or in Pembrokeshire) comes close to having this combination of factors.

 

AJ’s Comment:

The site at Waterloo Industrial Estate should have received more consideration. There is an area of flat land adjacent to other properties owned by Pembrokeshire County Council (PCC) and Milford Haven Port Authority (MHPA) have property on the foreshore. The site is within the Haven Waterway Enterprise Zone, and all that implies. See my blog post at for more detail of this site:

https://pdboyinsuffolk.blogspot.com/2021/02/pembroke-dock-infrastructure-project-at.html

The location of the project at Waterloo would require extensive consultation regarding potential temporary damage to the Special Area of Conservation and the Cosheston Pill SSSI balanced against the permanent loss of a group of highly significant listed monuments in Pembroke Dockyard that represent the fundamental reason why the town came into existence.

Other companies with businesses established at Waterloo, particulary those in the heavy industrial fabrication sector would doubtlessly welcome the infrastructure that the project would bring. After all, the governing document of Milford Haven Port Authority states that its aims include the development of the economic and cultural well-being and benefit of the communities around Milford Haven. See:

https://www.mhpa.co.uk/corporate-governance/

There are other land holders who have businesses at Waterloo, but, as mentioned above, many of these presently carry out work related to the renewable marine energy sector and I am sure that with the combined drive and negotiating power of MHPA and PCC agreement advantageous to these businesses could be established. Some of the plots have leases that are about to or have expired. One plot is subject to bankruptcy procedures.

I hope to post a blog about this later. 

AJ. 26/2/2021

 

 

Pembroke Dock Infrastructure - Milford Haven Port Authority Answers some Questions Question 1.

Milford Haven Port Authority’s Responses to Questions Posed at the Recent Advisory Committee Meeting – Question 1

 
Billy Gannon, The Pembroke Dock Community Representative on Milford Haven Port Authority’s (MHPA) Advisory Committee, has received the following response to one of the questions put to the MHPA at their last advisory meeting. 

The first question was:
1. Two of the proposed sheds are so large that they will permanently change the appearance of the Dockyard and views of the Haven for residents and visitors. This could have a detrimental effect upon the development of Tourism in Pembroke Dock and local house prices. The scale of the project and the building of the slipway will also impact upon a number of Heritage and Tourism Assets in the Dockyard.

Do the sheds need to be this big? Is there no other way of assembling components that would allow for smaller sheds to be used and the heritage and tourist assets in the Dockyard to be preserved as they are?

Reply from MHPA: The size of the sheds in the application are indicative only. Sheds will not be built speculatively but will be built on demand when there is commercial need. The size will be determined at this point.

AJ’s Comment
A document lately available for the planning application 20/0732/PA shows that the burying of The Timber Pond and the destruction of Slips 1 and 2 will take place in the very first phase of the scheme (Phase 1) proposed by MHPA. See this phasing plan here. This conveniently removes the Timber Pond at the earliest opportunity so that its fate is no longer a factor for discussion.

This burial of a unique monument in Wales also requires the land between slips 1 and 2 to be removed to provide the fill for the Timber Pond (Grade II). The land between Slips 1 and 2 is largely material that was used in a fantastically expensive scheme in the 19th century to level the whole dockyard site.

This assorted debris, (originally destined to be dumped at sea until Natural Resources Wales said “No!”), when it is dumped into the Timber Pond, will sink into and through the puddled clay base of the pond (See TNA ADM 140/486) and then through the buried former silt covered shoreline to some unknown depth. This would make uncovering the Timber Pond, removing the in-fill and returning it to anything like its former self, a horrendously expensive task that could, realistically, never be realised. This important heritage asset should be scheduled as an Ancient Monument and preserved as it is and public access granted. Any future moves to restore the pond to its former functionality would then only require silt to be removed and the conduit to the beach, beneath the dockyard wall on the western side, investigated and cleared/restored.
It is also worth noting that the sheds are to be built according to commercial demand, so the actual construction of them is the very last phase of the development, as indicated in the report here.

By then, of course, the damage to the Timber Pond (Listed Grade II), Slips 1 and 2 and the Graving Dock (Listed Grade II*) will have been done. Where could you then put the 40 metre tall Shed A? Put it on Waterloo Industrial Estate.

Reply from MHPA: We agree that Pembroke Dock has an exciting story to tell and there is an opportunity to increase the number of visitors to the town. As active members of Pembroke Dock Town Team we continue to work collaboratively to achieve this collective aim.

AJ’s Comment
Pembroke Dock Town Council (PDTC ) has expressed unequivocal dislike for the scheme and has recommended that Pembrokeshire County Council refuse the application. See PDTC’s letter here.

Reply from MHPA: We are working on a number of ideas to make areas of the Port which are currently inaccessible available for visitors to appreciate by other means, for example using Augmented Reality. We have also committed to improvements along Carriage Drive which will add value to the tourism offer. (Also see further info under question 5).

AJ’s Comment
The idea that MHPA are investigating to interpret the areas of the port that are currently inaccessible to the public include an online mapping scheme where material is crowd sourced from members of the public. This begs the question that if the public cannot presently get to these heritage sites within the dockyard, how can they produce material for this crowd sourced project? I have heard of no other ideas from MHPA that show any commitment to a serious interpretation of the heritage they propose to destroy.


The above is my take on the answers given by MHPA in response to the question posed. You will notice that some parts of the original question have been studiously avoided by MHPA. They refer to answers being put for Question 5. I will deal with his later.

AJ.25/2/2021

Wednesday 24 February 2021

Pembroke Dock Infrastructure Project at Waterloo.

 An Alternative to the Destruction of Pembroke Dockyard's Last Pieces of Shipbuilding Heritage


Waterloo is an area on the eastern side of Pembroke Dock, Pembrokeshire, Wales. 


Originally the area, after 1815, was a row of single story cottages on the western side of the road to Pembroke Ferry. These cottages, built by workers at Pembroke Dockyard, overlooked East Llanion Pill, which until the mid-20th century was shallow inlet of  Cosheston Pill, itself an inlet of Milford Haven. After the the Cleddau Bridge opened in the 1975, the road to Pembroke Ferry was widened and improved to accommodate the A477 which from that date ran over the new bridge to the north side of Milford Haven.

Figure 1. Waterloo and East Llanion Pill in 1966. Depths are in fathoms and feet.


At the same time the bridge was being built, the shallow water at East Llanion Pill was reclaimed by Pembrokeshire County Council - an idea that had been envisaged initially in the nineteenth century. The reclaimed land became the industrial and commercial estate that we see today. The extract from an Admiralty Chart below shows the Waterloo area and Cosheston Pill before the land reclamation took place. The chart is dated 1966.

The industrial estate at Waterloo developed rapidly and today is a mixture of empty plots, fabrication and painting businesses, builders' merchants, travellers' site and PCC's civic amenity site (recycling facility).

A modern map of the site shows the extent of the land fill at East Llanion Pill


Figure 2. A chart of 2007. The Warrior has gone and the extent of landfill at East Llanion Pill is evident.

The area of land reclamation is now the Watereloo Industrial Estate.

Figure 3. The Waterloo Industrial Estate.


To the north of the Waterloo industrial estate is the area once occupied by an Admiralty oil storage depot. This depot was serviced by a berthing pontoon. This pontoon was famously the hulk of the iron clad battleship, HMS Warrior, which was moored alongside two stub jetties below the steep cliffs and woods of Llanion. You can see the location in Figure 1. Figure 4 shows the Warrior moored at this location. The photograph was taken in 1952.

Figure 4. HMS Warrior at Llanion in 1952.

An Alternative Site

The Waterloo industrial estate would seem to be a good alternative site for the Pembroke Dock Infrastructure project.

Space for Large Fabrication Sheds (Dimensions kindly supplied my Milford Haven Port Authority)

These sheds proposed for the site in Pembroke Dockyard are intended to be:

Figure 5. Locations of proposed large sheds in Pembroke Dockyard





Shed A – Fabrication building for sub-assemblies and marine engineering related activities (11,900sqm) – (170m X 70m and 40m to ridge)

Shed B – High bay ship repair and fabrication building (4,900sqm) – (75m X 65m and 40m to ridge)

Shed C - Light assembly and maintenance building (2,500sqm) – (129m X 20m and 10m to ridge)

 These sheds could be accommodated easily within the Waterloo Industrial Estate, as I will illustrate later.

Figure 6 shows the land at Waterloo and Llanion with known ownership. The map is an ongoing project and will be updated as more information is gathered.


Figure 6. Leasehold and Freehold Properties at Waterloo and Llanion


Most of the land north and west of the A477, has at some time been within public body ownership, whether this be Ministry of Defence, Pembrokeshire County Council or Welsh Ministers. For example, the former landfill site upon which most of the Waterloo Industrial Estate sits was the freehold of Pembrokeshire County Council (PCC). Some of this land has now been purchased by other organisations/businesses and much of the remainder has been leased out by PCC on terms varying form 10 years to 99 years. Some of this leasheold property has been sublet to others, and in one instance sublet again!

The ex-Admiralty land on the high ground east of the Cleddau Bridge, formerly a fuel oil depot, is largely owned by PCC and Welsh Ministers. The unshaded land north of the Waterloo Industrial Estate is of undetermined ownership, but it is believed to be in the freehold of PCC. If you know better, please let me know!

In the south-east corner of the Industrial Site is a travellers' site, the freehold of PCC, but this, I understand is being closed in the very near future.

There are several advantages to using the Waterloo Industrial Estate for the Pembroke Dock Infrastructure project. Many of the companies that already occupy the site have extensive and current experience of working on the type of devices and structures that the project envisages would be built or maintained in the dockyard. Indeed, some of the companies who operate their businesses from Waterloo Industrial Estate have already produced marine energy devices.

Other advantages of the site are that there is already a good communications infrastructure available and the buildings of the Bridge Innovation Centre gives access to state of the art business premises for meetings, offices and workshops.

The Bridges Innovation Centre is also home for the Marine Energy Engineering Centre of Excellence (MEECE), one of the cornerstones of the scheme proposed by Milford Haven Port Authority (MHPA) and supported by PCC, and academic institutions across Wales. It would make sense to have this centre adjacent to the facilities that MHPA propose placing in the dockyard. The Waterloo Industrial Estate is a far more sensible place to put facilities required, plus the heritage of the dockyard could be preserved for other purposes.

Indeed, one of the companies who have already made a commitment to Pembroke Dock is already based near at hand to the Waterloo site. This is Bombora, who have a presence at the The Offices, Cleddau Reach, Llanion. Their website is very informative.

The big problem with the Waterloo site is the lack of adequate access to deep water. However, this could be overcome by building a 70 metre wide hard standing down the western bank of Cosheston Pill, terminating in a slip where the water depth increases dramatically just east of the former mooring site of the Warrior. The water depth here drops off rapidly to 12+ metres (See Figure 2). The width of the channel a little further downstream has a width of 55 metres. If insufficient, this could be widened with judicious dredging just off the former NATO jetty at Burton. It must be recalled that in the past fleet auxiliary tankers and civilian oil tankers used to moor alongside the Warrior on a regular basis to discharge or take on fuel oil. They were not small ships. This area of the Milford Haven Waterway is a site designated for the testing of marine energy devices, a project sponsored by Marine Energy Wales and Pembrokeshire Coastal Forum. 

National Resources Wales (NRW) have had some concern over the cumulative effects of sea-floor disturbance at Llanion, associated with the test site, and the dredging and operations at Pembroke Dockyard. Confining subsurface work to this one area is likely to mitigate the cumulative effects that NRW has concerns about. See here and here.

Amongst other businesses that would be affected by the establishment of the Pembroke Dock Infrastructure project at Waterloo Industrial Estate would be Llanion Cove Ltd. This company operates a water sports activity centre north of the Industrial Estate and on land owned by MHPA. This land would be required to allow the PDI project to have access to deep water. Llanion Cove Ltd also run the The Cove restaurant, but should the PDI project go ahead at this location it could adapt its business to providing for the workforce on the site. The water sports activities could be relocated to the western dockyard where the  Timber Pond could be used as part of the initial training of customers. Slips 1 and 2 would provide good access to the waterway.

The map below (Figure 7) shows possible locations for the slipway and Sheds A, B and C that MHPA propose to erect on the buried remains of the western dockyard. The diagram is indicative only, but it does show that the big sheds and the proposed slip would fit into the site at Waterloo.

Figure 7. Possible placement of PDI Large Structures at Waterloo

In my next post I will explain the proposal in more detail. There are many questions that you will need answers for.

















Saturday 13 February 2021

Planning Applications for Pembroke Dockyard - Pembroke Dock Infrastructure and Pembroke Marine - Their current status

 These planning applications are live (or not!!) at the moment on the Pembrokeshire County Council website. There is a link to each application below the description.


Pembrokeshire County Council have updated their planning website. It is now possible to download all documents for an application in one go as a ZIP file. Very Good. However, the naming of the files that are downloaded is still very poor and meaningless. Perhaps that will be the next thing they will sort out.

As far as I am aware, PCC no longer has a dedicated Conservation Officer, which is unfortunate, given the scope of this project. 


Details to follow of the applications below. The links should work, but they are now closed for comments.

21/0561/DC Infill of Timber Pond

21/0565/DC Discharge of conditions 2 and 4 of permission 20/0901/CA

21/0568/NM Modification of condition 18 (mitigation works in respect of the graving dock caisson, re-use of dock furniture, the former foreman’s office, the Sunderland Hangar Annexes, the Carriage Drive/South East Cluster, and Paddock Wall including an implementation timetable) of Outline Planning Permission ref.20/0732/PA



Meanwhile, the next three applications below are still open for comment as of 24/11/2021


NEW to this Blog 24/11/2021
Discharge of conditions 8 (Construction Traffic Management Plan), 9 (Construction Environmental Management Plan), 14 (Written Scheme of Investigation), 15 (Historic Building Recording) and 19 (Ecological Conservation & Enhancement Plan) in respect of Phase 1 (Outline Planning Permission ref.20/0732/PA)

21/0558/DC 

09-Sep-2021 

 

 

Discharge of Conditions 

Pembroke Dock Town Council 

Pembroke Dock: Market 

Gate 4, Pembroke Dockyard, The Dockyard, Pembroke Dock, SA72 6TE 

Discharge of conditions 8 (Construction Traffic Management Plan), 9 (Construction Environmental Management Plan), 14 (Written Scheme of Investigation), 15 (Historic Building Recording) and 19 (Ecological Conservation & Enhancement Plan) in respect of Phase 1 (Outline Planning Permission ref.20/0732/PA) 

Initial Recommendation 


Open for Comment




NEW to this Blog 24/11/2021
Approval of Layout, Access, Appearance, Landscaping and Scale in respect of Phase 1 (Reserved Matters of outline planning permission ref.20/0732/PA - Demolition, part demolition and infill, modification of slipways, erection of buildings and ancillary development - for port related activities including the manufacture of marine energy devices, boat manufacture and repair and erection of plant) (including those details required as part of the Reserved Matters application by reason of conditions 5, 6, 7, 17, and 20 of the outline planning permission)

21/0555/PA 

09-Sep-2021 

 

 

Res Mttrs 

19-Oct-2021

Pembroke Dock Town Council 

Pembroke Dock: Market 

Gate 4, THE DOCKYARD, Pembroke Dock, SA72 6TE 

Approval of Layout, Access, Appearance, Landscaping and Scale in respect of Phase 1 (Reserved Matters of outline planning permission ref.20/0732/PA - Demolition, part demolition and infill, modification of slipways, erection of buildings and ancillary development - for port related activities including the manufacture of marine energy devices, boat manufacture and repair and erection of plant) (including those details required as part of the Reserved Matters application by reason of conditions 5, 6, 7, 17, and 20 of the outline planning permission). 

Consultations Sent 

Open for Comment

See here


NEW to this Blog 24/11/2021Discharge of conditions 3 (written scheme of inve
stigation), 4 (building recording) and 5 (Conservation Management Plan) of Listed Building Consent Ref.20/0893/LB

21/0656/DC 

27-Sep-2021 

 

 

Discharge of Conditions 

Pembroke Dock Town Council 

Pembroke Dock: Market 

Slipway No.1 and No.2 within Gate 4 at The Dockyard, Pembroke Dockyard, Pembroke Dock, SA72 6TE 

Discharge of conditions 3 (written scheme of investigation), 4 (building recording) and 5 (Conservation Management Plan) of Listed Building Consent Ref.20/0893/LB  

Consultations Sent 

Open for Comment

See here

The demolition of historical buildings that are not listed in the western dockyard, Pembroke Dock. The dockyard is part of the Pembroke Dock Conservation Area.

20/0901/CA 

19-Jan-2021 

 

 

Conservation Area 

05-Mar-2021

10-Mar-2021

Pembroke Dock Town Council 

Pembroke Dock: Market 

Various Buildings, Pembroke Dockyard, The Dockyard, Pembroke Dock, SA72        6TE 

Demolition of various buildings 

Consultations Sent 

Closed for Comment (Tick)

 See here.




A Marine Energy Test Site off Llanion in the Milford Haven Waterway


20/0756/PA 

28-Dec-2020 

 

 

Major (Full) 

08-Feb-2021

12-Feb-2021

Pembroke Dock Town Council 

Pembroke Dock: Llanion 

Milford Haven Waterway, Warrior Way (Site 6), Pembroke Dock, SA72 6UB 

Provision of an off-shore marine energy test site to facilitate the testing and development of marine energy projects to allow for deployment and testing of components and sub-assemblies, ancillary activities and equipment in support of marine energy testing. 

Consultations Sent 

Open Closed for Comment This application has been PASSED. (So why still open for comment??).15/3/2021. Marine Licence notification  added to documents. Final decision notice published on the website 29/3/2021

See: https://www.westerntelegraph.co.uk/news/19147213.marine-energy-testing-site-haven-waterway-approved/

See here.




Partial Demolition of Slips 1 and 2 (Listed Grade II), Pembroke Dockyard


20/0893/LB 

19-Jan-2021 

 

 

List Bld 

26-Feb-2021

24-Feb-2021

Pembroke Dock Town Council 

Pembroke Dock: Market 

Slipway No 1 and No 2, Pembroke Dockyard, Pembroke Dock, SA72 6TE 

Part demolition and modification of slipways at Gate 4, Pembroke Dockyard, The Dockyard, Pembroke Dock 

Consultations Sent 

Closed for Comment (Tick)

See here.




The filling in and burying of the Graving Dock (Grade II*), Pembroke Dockyard


20/0897/LB 

19-Jan-2021 

 

 

List Bld 

26-Feb-2021

24-Feb-2021

Pembroke Dock Town Council 

Pembroke Dock: Market 

Graving Dock, Pembroke Dockyard, The Dockyard, Pembroke Dock, SA72 6TE 

Infill of Graving Dock and removal and restoration of caisson 

Consultations Sent 


Closed for comment.

See here.



The filling in and burial of the Timber Pond (Listed Grade II), Pembroke Dock. Only one in Wales.


20/0896/LB 

19-Jan-2021 

 

 

List Bld 

24-Feb-2021

Pembroke Dock Town Council 

Pembroke Dock: Market 

Timber Pond, Pembroke Dockyard, The Dockyard, Pembroke Dock, SA72 6TE 

Infill of Timber Pond 

Consultations Sent 

Open for Comment (tick). Closed for comment. Passed with conditions. See decison statement at this link.

See here.



Outline Planning Permission for the whole scheme -  that will do irreparable damage to the heritage assets of Pembroke Dockyard and the tourism potential of Pembroke Dock.


20/0732/PA 

16-Dec-2020 

 

 

EIA (Outline) 

20-Jan-2021

22-Jan-2021

Pembroke Dock Town Council 

Pembroke Dock: Market 

Gate 4, Pembroke Dockyard, The Dockyard, Pembroke Dock, SA72 6TE 

Demolition, part demolition and infill, modification of slipways, erection of buildings and ancillary development - for port related activities including the manufacture of marine energy devices, boat manufacture and repair and erection of plant (outline planning permission with all matters reserved for future consideration) 

Consultations Sent 

Open for Comment.(tick) Closed. Passed with conditions. Future decisions regarding any applications issuing from this outline permission will be delegated decisions,excepting the final height of sheds A,B (and C(?)). See: https://pembrokeshire.public-i.tv/core/portal/webcast_interactive/535740

See here for planning documents.